Graph Neural Networks for Surface-State Prediction in Topological Semimetals: Principles, Architectures, and Emerging Applications

Authors

  • Zhaoyu Zhu School of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University
  • Han Sun School of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University
  • Zean Wang School of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University

Keywords:

Graph Neural Networks, Topological SemiMetals, Surface States, Fermi Arcs, Weyl Semimetal, Nodal-line Semimetal, Spin Transport, Machine Learning

Abstract

Topological semimetals—encompassing Weyl semimetals, Dirac semimetals, and nodal-line semimetals—host surface states whose existence is guaranteed by bulk topology rather than surface termination details. Predicting these surface states accurately and efficiently is essential for connecting theoretical classifications to experimental observables such as ARPES spectra, quantum oscillations, and anomalous transport coefficients. Classical first-principles approaches are accurate but computationally expensive; they struggle to scan parameter spaces, disorder effects, and heterostructure geometries at scale. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) offer a compelling alternative: by encoding crystal structures as atom-bond graphs and learning symmetry-respecting representations, they can predict surface-state dispersions, Fermi arcs, and topological invariants at a fraction of the DFT cost. This review systematically examines the theoretical underpinnings of topological surface states, the design principles of GNN architectures suited to this task, benchmark comparisons with DFT, and case studies spanning Weyl semimetals, nodal-line systems, and magnetic topological semimetals relevant to spin transport. We identify open challenges—including disorder, strong correlations, and finite-temperature dynamics—and propose directions for next-generation models.

References

Alpsoy, A. İ., Güner, S., Kurt, V., & Tekin, S. B. (2025). Can CT Bone Density Predict Fracture Healing? Clinical and Radiological Correlation of Hounsfield Units in Distal Radius Fractures. Bratislava Medical Journal, 126(11), 3091-3096.

Brunken, F., Bullert, B., Grützner, P. A., Vetter, S. Y., & Beisemann, N. (2025). Comparison of 2D and 3D fluoroscopy for intraoperative detection of intra-articular incongruities in distal radius fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20(1), 824.

Clark, S. P., Ilsø, M., Werlinrud, J. C., Rasmussen, B. S., & Jensen, J. (2025). Distal radius fracture–Supination underestimates dorsal tilt in distal radius fracture radiographs: a case report. Emergency Radiology, 32(4), 663-668.

Diepold, J., Filipp, S., Dussing, F., Steiner, G., Deininger, C., Gotterbarm, T., & Wichlas, F. (2025). Poor fracture alignment equals poor outcome? Analysis of conservatively managed distal radius fractures. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 145(1), 442.

Dissaneewate, P., Thanavirun, P., Tangjaroenpaisan, Y., & Dissaneewate, K. (2025). External validation and revision of the Lafontaine criteria for unstable distal radius fractures: a retrospective study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20(1), 146.

Hancock, D. W., Barrett-Lee, J. J. T., Abdellatif, A. M. A., White, S., Liu, P., & Roberts, D. (2025). Metaphyseal distal radius fractures in adolescents: is closed reduction and casting sufficient for most?. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 35(1), 64.

Naito, K., Imazu, N., Ishi, S., Yamamoto, Y., Suzuki, T., Kawamura, K., ... & Ishijima, M. (2025). Central sensitization inventory score after surgical treatment for distal radius fractures. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 35(1), 187.

Pradyumna, K. Y., Jain, D. K. A., Reddy, R. S., & Fabbro, G. D. (2026). Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Radius Fractures: A Safe Technique with Reliable Clinical, Radiological, Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 1-10.

Scioscia, J., Fiedler, B., Ghilzai, U., Birhiray, D., Hauck, J., Chilukuri, S., ... & Deveza, L. (2026). Novel artificial intelligence model predicts the need for reduction of distal radius fractures. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 36(1), 31.

van Veelen, N. M., Horvat, M., Link, B. C., van de Wall, B. J., & Beeres, F. J. (2025). Locking pegs versus locking screws in volar plating of distal radius fractures: NM Van Veelen et al. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 51(1), 217.

Whelehan, S. P., McCabe, F. J., Merghani, K., Sheehan, E., & Feeley, I. (2026). Assessing the frequency and utility of orthopaedic outpatient department (OPD) attendances of surgically managed distal radius and ankle fractures. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971-), 195(1), 319-325.

Zhang, C., & Liu, L. (2025). Machine learning prediction model for medical environment comfort based on SHAP and LIME interpretability analysis. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 39269.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Zhu, Z., Sun, H., & Wang, Z. (2026). Graph Neural Networks for Surface-State Prediction in Topological Semimetals: Principles, Architectures, and Emerging Applications. International Journal of Advanced AI Applications, 2(4), 41–52. Retrieved from http://www.dawnclarity.press/index.php/ijaaa/article/view/139